Every great leader has had an instinct for execution. He has said, in effect, “Unless I can make this plan happen, it’s not going to matter.” But the selection, training, and development of leaders doesn’t focus on this reality.
Judging from our observations, a high proportion of those who actually rise to the top of a business organization have made their mark—their personal “brand”— as high-level thinkers. They are the kind of people who get caught up in the intellectual excitement of each new big idea that comes out and adopt it with enthusiasm.
They are articulate conceptualizers, very good at grasping strategies and explaining them. This, they know, is what it takes to get ahead. They aren’t interested in the “how” of getting things done; that’s for somebody else to think about.
Judging a person’s intelligence is easy for people who hire and promote others; it’s harder to research a person’s track record and gauge their know-how about getting things done, particularly when the performance is the result of many people working together. But the intelligent, articulate conceptualizers don’t necessarily understand how to execute. Many don’t realize what needs to be done to convert a vision into specific tasks, because their high-level thinking is too broad. They don’t follow through and get things done; the details bore them. They don’t crystallize thought or anticipate roadblocks. They don’t know how to pick people for their organizations who can execute. Their lack of engagement deprives them of the sound judgment about people that comes only through practice.
Bossidy and Charan (2002)
The above lines by Bossidy & Charan show insights I would never be able to articulate.
Comments 1
Indeed….
Posted 13 Feb 2009 at 2:49 am ¶I can’t agree with the 2 authors either.
If a leader thinks that he/she is only a “strategist” and is somehow above the operational hell of the business, then he/she is not a leader in the first place.
Post a Comment